Newly elected MP George Galloway’s accusations of UK involvement in the Moscow terror attack have ignited controversy and drawn harsh criticism from fellow MPs. Hereâs the full story.
Stirring Up Controversy
In the aftermath of the tragic Moscow terror attack, newly elected MP George Galloway did what he does best by stirring up controversy surrounding the incident by implicating the UK in the massacre.Â
ISIS Attack
Gallowayâs remarks, made on his YouTube channel, accused the US and the UK of lying about the involvement of ISIS in the attack, which claimed the lives of at least 139 people and left approximately 360 injured.
âThey Were Lyingâ
Galloway stated, âWhen the US, UK and others quickly tried to assure me that it was only ISIS (banned in the Russian Federation) that committed this massacre in Moscow, I automatically realised that they were lying.
âNo One Has Explainedâ
He continued, âAnd this is what I discovered: first of all, no one has explained the unannounced visit of former president Barack Obama to meet British politicians and security officials in Downing Street three days before this terrorist crime was committed.
âThis Harbinger of Deathâ
Galloway then went on to say, âResearching even further, I discovered that Victoria Nuland [former senior US diplomat], this harbinger of death, this angel of death, who, if she approaches you, you can be sure that civil war is coming in your country. And she promised the Russians some unpleasant surprises in the coming weeks and months.â
Swift Condemnation
Gallowayâs assertions, deemed irresponsible by fellow MPs, insinuated Western involvement in the attack, drawing swift condemnation. His claims, which echo Kremlin narratives suspiciously closely, were picked up by Russian state media and reprinted.Â
âFour Pieces of Evidenceâ
Galloway claimed he had âfour pieces of evidence that lead me to believe that the United States, its Nato allies, and their puppet stump state Ukraine are, in fact, responsible for this massacreâ.
Unsubstantiated Claims
Gallowayâs remarks aligned with Russian President Vladimir Putinâs unsubstantiated claims implicating Ukraine in the attack despite a complete lack of evidence.Â
Justifying Aggression
Analysts warned of Putinâs long and sordid history of leveraging terrorist incidents to justify aggression and the potential fallout that might follow such an attack.
âUtter Nonsenseâ
David Cameron, the foreign secretary, rebuffed Gallowayâs allegations, labelling them as âutter nonsenseâ in a post on X, formerly Twitter.Â
Reckless Assertions
Many MPs criticised Gallowayâs assertions as reckless, asserting that they played into the Kremlinâs hands by fueling divisive narratives.
âTypically Far Fetchedâ
Tobias Ellwood, a former chair of parliamentâs defence committee, condemned Gallowayâs comments as irresponsible. He stated, âWhilst his words will be quickly dismissed as a typically far-fetched, factually incorrect rant, Moscow will exploit this to spin its own domestic narrative that NATO is to blame.â
Irresponsible and Reckless
He continued, âGallowayâs words are not only irresponsible but reckless.â
Lack of Evidence
Other critics, including Conservative MPs Bob Seely and Henry Smith, dismissed Gallowayâs claims, emphasising the absence of evidence linking the US, UK, or Ukraine to the attack.Â
âNo Evidenceâ
Seely stated, âThere is absolutely no evidence that the US or the UK or Ukraine or NATO were in any way responsible, and sadly, this sort of wild speculation plays into the hands of the Kremlin and will be used to support this absolute fiction of a claim.â
Caving in to Reality
Despite attempts to attribute blame to Ukraine, Putin eventually acknowledged radical Islamist terrorists as responsible for the attack.Â
âWho Ordered Itâ
However, after admitting that ISIS, who claimed responsibility, had carried out the attack, Putin added ominously, âNow we want to know who ordered it.â
Preventing Escalation
International observers quickly denounced Putinâs attempt to implicate Ukraine without evidence, highlighting the need for a measured response to prevent further escalation.
Indicative of Involvement
Counterterrorism analysts cited the modus operandi of Isis Khorasan, a terrorist offshoot with a presence in Tajikistan, as indicative of the groupâs involvement in the attack.Â
Kremlin Narrative
Gallowayâs comments garnered attention from Russian media outlets, amplifying his claims and contributing to disseminating the Kremlin-friendly narrative.Â
Courting Controversy
This is not the first time Galloway has courted controversy with remarks regarding the war in Ukraine, having previously claimed that the Russian massacre of civilians in Bucha, just north of Kyiv, in April 2022, was likely staged.
Notably Absent
Despite his campaign for election focusing heavily on the war in Gaza, since his by-election victory, Galloway has been notably absent from several debates in the Commons on the ongoing humanitarian tragedy.Â
Firmly on the Fringes
George Gallowayâs accusations regarding Western involvement in the Moscow terror attack are unsurprising coming from a figure who, despite the much-vaunted rhetoric of his years in the Labour Party, has now found himself firmly on the fringes of British political life.Â
Violent Escalation
While his claims aligned suspiciously well with Kremlin narratives, they lack any evidence and risk a potentially violent escalation.Â
25 Things You CANâT Talk About Anymore
Remember the days when you could freely discuss just about anything without fear of sparking controversy? Well, those days are long gone. In todayâs hyper-sensitive world, there are topics so fraught with tension that even mentioning them can lead to heated debates and hurt feelings. 25 Things You CANâT Talk About Anymore
Stranded: 15 Worst British Cars in History
Ever had a car that spent more time with the mechanic than on the road? A car that turned every journey into a game of âWill we actually get there?â If so, you might just see a familiar face (or should we say, chassis) in our countdown to the most unreliable British car in history. Stranded: 15 Worst British Cars in History
âBritain Will Become Unrecognizableâ â Suella Braverman Spells Disaster for UK Amid Steep Rise in Visas Issued
Former Home Secretary Suella Braverman has warned that Britain will become âunrecognizable,â criticizing the amount of work visas the Home Office has approved, despite only being removed from her role in November. âBritain Will Become Unrecognizableâ â Suella Braverman Spells Disaster for UK Amid Steep Rise in Visas Issued
20 Things From the â70s That Are Not OK Today
Step into the time machine and set the dial to the 1970s, a decade of disco, bell-bottoms, and some rather questionable choices. While the â70s gave us iconic music and groundbreaking TV, not everything from this groovy era would get a green light today. 20 Things From the â70s That Are Not OK Today
20 Best and Worst Universities in the UK
Navigating the UK university landscape is like deciphering a complex code of rankings, reviews, and reputations to uncover where youâll not just learn, but truly flourish. Whether youâre drawn to the historic halls of Oxford or the creative buzz of Goldsmiths, finding your perfect fit is about aligning your aspirations with the unique offerings of each institution. 20 Best and Worst Universities in the UK
The post Galloway Accuses West of Lying About Moscow first appeared on Edge Media.
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock / Wirestock Creators.
Grant Gallacher is a seasoned writer with expertise in politics and impactful daily news. His work, deeply rooted in addressing issues that resonate with a wide audience, showcases an unwavering commitment to bringing forth the stories that matter. He is also known for satirical writing and stand up comedy.